Reflect your Personnel Selection: R & Taylor-Russell Tables » HOLTMEIER & FRIENDS (2024)

Taylor-Russell tables (Taylor & Russell, 1939) are designed to estimate the percentage of future employees who will be successful on the job if a particular selection method (eg. test, assessment center, interview) is used. I have already described the our Taylor-Russell-Tool (in German).

Now I will show how the number of recruited candidates is calculated precisely with R. I use the manipulate package. Therefore, the code will only run in the RSudio IDE. The big advantage is that one can easily observe the influences of

  1. the base rate of potentially suitable persons in the non-selected group of applicants as well as
  2. the validity of the selection process (by moving the slider).

This little program is excellent for teaching.

The calculations are based on an article of Richard A. Mclellan in the journal „Personnel Decisions International“ (1999): Theoretical Expectancies: Replacing Classic Utility Tables with Flexible, Accurate Computing Procedures.

And this is the result. Have fun trying.


F1 <- function(P) { SPLIT <- 0.42 A0 <- 2.50662823884 A1 <- -18.61500062529 A2 <- 41.391199773534 A3 <- -25.44106049637 B1 <- -8.4735109309 B2 <- 23.08336743743 B3 <- -21.06224101826 B4 <- 3.13082909833 C0 <- -2.78718931138 C1 <- -2.29796479134 C2 <- 4.85014127135 C3 <- 2.32121276858 D1 <- 3.54388924762 D2 <- 1.63706781897 Q <- P - 0.5 if (abs(Q) <= SPLIT) { R <- Q*Q PPN <- Q * (((A3 * R + A2) * R + A1) * R + A0) / ((((B4 * R + B3) * R + B2) * R + B1)*R +1.0) return(PPN) } R <- P if (Q > 0) {R =1.0-P}
if (R <= 0) { print("You have entered a value that is not permitted. The result is false.") return(0) } R <- sqrt(-log(R)) PPN <- (((C3 * R + C2) * R + C1) * R + C0) / ((D2 * R + D1) * R + 1.0) if (Q < 0) {PPN =-PPN} return(PPN)}F2 <- function(X) { P1A <- 242.667955230532 P1B <- 21.97926616182942 P1C <- 6.996383488661914 P1D <- -3.5609843701815E-02 Q1A <- 215.058875869861 Q1B <- 91.1649054045149 Q1C <- 15.0827976304078 Q1D <- 1.0 P2A <- 300.459261020162 P2B <- 451.918953711873 P2C <- 339.320816734344 P2D <- 152.98928504694 P2E <- 43.1622272220567 P2F <- 7.21175825088309 P2G <- .564195517478994 P2H <- -1.36864857382717E-07 Q2A <- 300.459260956983 Q2B <- 790.950925327898 Q2C <- 931.35409485061 Q2D <- 638.980264465631 Q2E <- 277.585444743988 Q2F <- 77.0001529352295 Q2G <- 12.7827273196294 Q2H <- 1.0 P3A <- -2.99610707703542E-03 P3B <- -4.94730910623251E-02 P3C <- -.226956593539687 P3D <- -.278661308609648 P3E <- -2.23192459734185E-02 Q3A <- 1.06209230528468E-02 Q3B <- .19130892610783 Q3C <- 1.05167510706793 Q3D <- 1.98733201817135 Q3E <- 1.0 SQRT2 <- 1.4142135623731 SQRTPI <- 1.77245385090552 Y <- X/SQRT2 if (Y < 0) { Y <- -Y SN <- -1.0 } else { SN <- 1.0 } Y2 <- Y * Y if (Y < 0.46875) { R1 <- ((P1D * Y2 + P1C) * Y2 + P1B) * Y2 + P1A R2 <- ((Q1D * Y2 + Q1C) * Y2 + Q1B) * Y2 + Q1A ERFVAL <- Y * R1 / R2 if (SN == 1) LOAREA <- 0.5 + 0.5 * ERFVAL else LOAREA <- 0.5 - 0.5 * ERFVAL } else { if (Y < 4.0) { R1 <- ((((((P2H * Y + P2G) * Y + P2F) * Y + P2E) * Y + P2D) * Y + P2C) * Y + P2B) * Y + P2A R2 <- ((((((Q2H * Y + Q2G) * Y + Q2F) * Y + Q2E) * Y + Q2D) * Y + Q2C) * Y + Q2B) * Y + Q2A ERFCVAL <- exp(-Y2) * R1 / R2 } else { Z <- Y2 * Y2 R1 <- (((P3E * Z + P3D) * Z + P3C) * Z + P3B) * Z + P3A R2 <- (((Q3E * Z + Q3D) * Z + Q3C) * Z + Q3B) * Z + Q3A ERFCVAL <- (exp(-Y2) / Y) * (1.0 / SQRTPI + R1 / (R2 * Y2)) } if (SN == 1) LOAREA <- 1.0 - 0.5 * ERFCVAL else LOAREA <- 0.5 * ERFCVAL } UPAREA <- 1.0 - LOAREA return(UPAREA)}F3 <- function(H1, HK, R) { X <- c(0.04691008, 0.23076534, 0.5, 0.76923466, 0.95308992) W <- c(0.018854042, 0.038088059, 0.0452707394, 0.038088059, 0.018854042) H2 <- HK H12 <- (H1*H1 + H2*H2)/2.0 BV <- 0 if (abs(R) >= 0.7) {
R2 <- 1.0-R*R R3 <- sqrt(R2) if (R < 0) H2 <- -H2 H3 <- H1*H2 H7 <- exp(-H3 / 2.0) if (R2 != 0) { H6 <- abs(H1 - H2) H5 <- H6 * H6 / 2.0 H6 <- H6 / R3 AA <- 0.5 - (H3 / 8.0) AB <- 3.0 - (2.0 * AA * H5) BV <- 0.13298076 * H6 * AB * F2(H6) - exp(-H5 / R2) * (AB + AA * R2) * 0.053051647 for (i in 1:5) { R1 <- R3 * X[i] RR <- R1 * R1 R2 <- sqrt( 1.0- RR) BV <- BV - W[i] * exp(-H5 / RR) * (exp(-H3 / (1.0 + R2)) / R2 / H7 - 1.0 - AA * RR) } } if (R > 0 & H1 > H2) {
BV <- BV * R3 * H7 + F2(H1) return(BV) } if (R > 0 & H1 <= H2) { BV <- BV * R3 * H7 + F2(H2) return(BV) } if (R < 0 & (F2(H1) - F2(H2)) < 0) { BV <- 0 - BV * R3 * H7 return(BV) } if (R < 0 & (F2(H1) - F2(H2)) >= 0) {
BV <- (F2(H1) - F2(H2)) - BV * R3 * H7 return(BV) } } H3 <- H1 * H2 for (i in 1:5) { R1 <- R * X[i] RR2 <- 1.0 - R1 * R1 BV <- BV + W[i] * exp((R1 * H3 - H12) / RR2) / sqrt(RR2) } BV <- F2(H1) * F2(H2) + R * BV return(BV)}true_positives <- function(N, ToSelect,BaseRate, Validity) {round(F3(F1(1.0-ToSelect/N), F1(1.0-BaseRate), Validity)/(ToSelect/N)*ToSelect,1)}false_positives <- function(N, ToSelect,BaseRate, Validity) {round(ToSelect-F3(F1(1.0-ToSelect/N), F1(1.0-BaseRate), Validity)/(ToSelect/N)*ToSelect,1)}false_negatives <- function(N, ToSelect,BaseRate, Validity) {round(N*BaseRate - F3(F1(1.0-ToSelect/N), F1(1.0-BaseRate), Validity)/(ToSelect/N)*ToSelect,1)}true_negatives <- function(N, ToSelect,BaseRate, Validity) {N - true_positives(N, ToSelect,BaseRate, Validity) - false_positives(N, ToSelect,BaseRate, Validity) - false_negatives(N, ToSelect,BaseRate, Validity)}library(manipulate)manipulate( barplot( matrix(c(true_positives(Applicants, StaffRequirement, BaseRate, Validity), false_positives(Applicants, StaffRequirement, BaseRate, Validity), true_negatives(Applicants, StaffRequirement, BaseRate, Validity), false_negatives(Applicants, StaffRequirement, BaseRate, Validity)), nrow = 2, ncol=2, byrow=FALSE, dimnames = list(c("rightly", "wrongly"), c("recruited", "rejected"))), legend.text=TRUE, main="Reflect your personnel selection!"), Applicants=slider(1,100, step=1, initial = 50), StaffRequirement=slider(1,100, step=1, initial = 10), BaseRate=slider(0,1, step=.01, initial = .25), Validity=slider(0,1, step=.01, initial = .37))

___

Bildquelle: OpenAI. (2024). R-Script Taylor-Russell tables [Digital image created with DALL-E]. Retrieved from https://openai.com/

Reflect your Personnel Selection: R & Taylor-Russell Tables » HOLTMEIER & FRIENDS (2024)

FAQs

What is personnel selection in psychology? ›

Personnel Psychology

Personnel selection refers to the process of testing and evaluating job applicants for the purpose of determining the subset of applicants to whom job offers will be made.

What is the difference between hit rate and base rate? ›

Base rate- extent to which a particular trait, behavior, characteristic, or attribute exists in the population (expressed as proportion). Hit rate- proportion of people a test accurately identifies as possessing or exhibiting a trait, behavior, characteristic or attributes.

What is the goal of personnel psychology? ›

The purpose of personnel psychology is to apply psychological principles to assist organizations through the hiring process, training, performance evaluation, and job seeking. Personnel psychologists also help identify required job skills as well as create effective selection methods.

What are the steps in personnel selection? ›

The exact steps will vary by company, but the basics include announcing the job, reviewing applications, screening candidates, interviewing, final selection, testing, and making an offer. Depending on how many roles you are filling and the size of your hiring teams, some of these steps may be combined or repeated.

Is high base rate good? ›

Higher interest rates increase the return on savings. They also make the cost of borrowing more expensive. Higher interest rates help to slow down price rises (inflation). That's because they reduce how much is spent across the UK.

What is a base rate example? ›

It represents the fundamental probability of an event based solely on historical data or general knowledge without considering specific conditions or supplementary factors. For example, in a medical scenario, if a certain disease has a prevalence rate of 5% in a population, the base rate for that disease would be 5%.

What is a good hit rate in sales? ›

In most areas of the country, the average hit rate is about 20%. If you're winning more than 20% your doing pretty good. Many firms that I've talked to are happy that they're around 20%.

What are the selection methods in personnel psychology? ›

Cognitive ability tests are the psychological tests with the highest validity for personnel selection. They can predict the performance of a future worker better that other tests such as personality or integrity tests.

What are the psychological tests used in personnel selection? ›

BFQ identifies five personality factors: openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and neuroticism. Apart from cognitive ability tests and personality tests, other psychological tests for recruitment and selection include integrity tests, motivation tests, and values tests.

What is the difference between recruiting and selecting personnel? ›

Process: Recruitment is the process of finding potential candidates to apply for a job position, whereas selection is the process of identifying the best candidate to hire.

What is the scientific selection of personnel? ›

The Principle of Scientific Selection in personnel management aims to ensure that individuals are selected for positions based on their skills, abilities, and qualifications, leading to better job performance, job satisfaction, and organizational success.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tuan Roob DDS

Last Updated:

Views: 5479

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tuan Roob DDS

Birthday: 1999-11-20

Address: Suite 592 642 Pfannerstill Island, South Keila, LA 74970-3076

Phone: +9617721773649

Job: Marketing Producer

Hobby: Skydiving, Flag Football, Knitting, Running, Lego building, Hunting, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Tuan Roob DDS, I am a friendly, good, energetic, faithful, fantastic, gentle, enchanting person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.